<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Makes An Extreme Makeover Dentist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smilesouthflorida.com/blog/2008/05/extreme-makeover-dentist-of-south-florida/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smilesouthflorida.com/blog/2008/05/extreme-makeover-dentist-of-south-florida/</link>
	<description>Weblog: Dentistry Articles, Dental News, Patient Reviews, and Practice Updates</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: baby</title>
		<link>http://www.smilesouthflorida.com/blog/2008/05/extreme-makeover-dentist-of-south-florida/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smilesouthflorida.com/blog/?p=38#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Nice website!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice website!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.smilesouthflorida.com/blog/2008/05/extreme-makeover-dentist-of-south-florida/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smilesouthflorida.com/blog/?p=38#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I read similar article also named Makeover Dentist of South Florida &#124; Smile South Florida Cosmetic Dentistry, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read similar article also named Makeover <a href="http://www.smilesouthflorida.com/dentists/"  >Dentist</a> of South Florida | <a href="http://www.smilesouthflorida.com"  >Smile South Florida Cosmetic Dentistry</a>, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
